putting a value to football programs ...

Posted by: tmcats

putting a value to football programs ... - 06/05/18 11:44 AM

wsj draws some conclusions that are a tad bit surprising for some programs.
Posted by: parkhawk3319

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 12:53 PM

here's how I value your commentary.

Posted by: tmcats

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 01:55 PM

i'm not sure what point your dog is making. is he yours?
Posted by: KUCO_VOC

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 04:51 PM

The point? It’s obvious. Yes the article claims KSU has a higher value placed on its football program than KU’s. The value of the info? Less than the matter coming out of the non talking end of the canine.

But you do manage to squirt out a bunch of turds all over the KU website!
Posted by: 58hawk

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 05:01 PM

Originally Posted By: tmcats
wsj draws some conclusions that are a tad bit surprising for some programs.
How about an explanation on what "value added" means. Ranking of what?
Posted by: tmcats

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 05:49 PM

mostly a present value calculation with some assumptions about growth, etc, methinks.
Posted by: 58hawk

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 06:38 PM

Originally Posted By: tmcats
mostly a present value calculation with some assumptions about growth, etc, methinks.
So you posted something you really don't know about. That's a typical K-Fake person.
Posted by: tmcats

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 08:55 PM

Originally Posted By: 58hawk
Originally Posted By: tmcats
mostly a present value calculation with some assumptions about growth, etc, methinks.
So you posted something you really don't know about. That's a typical K-Fake person.



"Editor's note: According to a most recent study, the Wall Street Journal (from Sept. 2017) broke down each program’s most recently available revenues and expenses, making cash-flow adjustments, risk assessments and growth projections for each school."247 Sports
Posted by: KUCO_VOC

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 09:43 PM

Originally Posted By: tmcats
Originally Posted By: 58hawk
Originally Posted By: tmcats
mostly a present value calculation with some assumptions about growth, etc, methinks.
So you posted something you really don't know about. That's a typical K-Fake person.



"Editor's note: According to a most recent study, the Wall Street Journal (from Sept. 2017) broke down each program’s most recently available revenues and expenses, making cash-flow adjustments, risk assessments and growth projections for each school."247 Sports
Yes we like to see turds squirted out but KU will rebound. Go away
Posted by: KUCO_VOC

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 09:45 PM

Originally Posted By: tmcats
mostly a present value calculation with some assumptions about growth, etc, methinks.
If we get a real HC we have more value.
Posted by: EstebanBugatti

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/05/18 10:02 PM

I would just like to point out that this troll is literally banned on every other KU board. He'd be banned here as well if there were some mods.
Posted by: tmcats

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/06/18 09:57 AM

Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
I would just like to point out that this troll is literally banned on every other KU board. He'd be banned here as well if there were some mods.


that's absolutely untrue. why would you write such a thing? i have many j'hawk friends here and other places. if it offends you that i happen to know stuff then don't read my posts. the wsj numbers are interesting.
Posted by: beenahawk

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/06/18 10:41 AM

Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
I would just like to point out that this troll is literally banned on every other KU board. He'd be banned here as well if there were some mods.



Wrong again Esteban! Mods "edit/delete" first, then suggest "banning" to the LJW if the violations of board policy are serious enough. In over 12 years, I haven't seen TM violate a single policy. If his posting here offends you, go where the snowflakes go and melt in your own tears. cry
Posted by: EstebanBugatti

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/07/18 12:43 AM

Originally Posted By: tmcats
Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
I would just like to point out that this troll is literally banned on every other KU board. He'd be banned here as well if there were some mods.


that's absolutely untrue. why would you write such a thing? i have many j'hawk friends here and other places. if it offends you that i happen to know stuff then don't read my posts. the wsj numbers are interesting.

You think I'm dumb? I know you're banned on multiple boards. Why else would you be trying to troll this one? You're a JOKE.
Posted by: EstebanBugatti

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/07/18 12:44 AM

Originally Posted By: beenahawk
Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
I would just like to point out that this troll is literally banned on every other KU board. He'd be banned here as well if there were some mods.



Wrong again Esteban! Mods "edit/delete" first, then suggest "banning" to the LJW if the violations of board policy are serious enough. In over 12 years, I haven't seen TM violate a single policy. If his posting here offends you, go where the snowflakes go and melt in your own tears. cry

Looks like I hurt your little feelings. Don't cry, little baby. The douche is a troll and that is just a fact. The fact that you're trying to defend him is so pathetic.
Posted by: beenahawk

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/07/18 07:45 AM

Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
Originally Posted By: beenahawk
Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
I would just like to point out that this troll is literally banned on every other KU board. He'd be banned here as well if there were some mods.



Wrong again Esteban! Mods "edit/delete" first, then suggest "banning" to the LJW if the violations of board policy are serious enough. In over 12 years, I haven't seen TM violate a single policy. If his posting here offends you, go where the snowflakes go and melt in your own tears. cry

Looks like I hurt your little feelings. Don't cry, little baby. The douche is a troll and that is just a fact. The fact that you're trying to defend him is so pathetic.


My feelings aren't hurt at all...no tears either. If and when the LJW comes up with a policy defining and banning trolls, I will gladly do my duty and ban them. I would suggest you actually READ the policies of this board and at least TRY to comprehend them, though that appears too unlikely in a case like yours.I also suggest you pick up a copy of the US Constitution and study the first amendment for a few years.
Posted by: tmcats

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/07/18 09:07 AM

Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
Originally Posted By: tmcats
Originally Posted By: EstebanBugatti
I would just like to point out that this troll is literally banned on every other KU board. He'd be banned here as well if there were some mods.


that's absolutely untrue. why would you write such a thing? i have many j'hawk friends here and other places. if it offends you that i happen to know stuff then don't read my posts. the wsj numbers are interesting.

You think I'm dumb? I know you're banned on multiple boards. Why else would you be trying to troll this one? You're a JOKE.


like here?

or here?
Posted by: PHOGUSHER

Re: putting a value on dmcats opinions - 06/07/18 11:37 AM

I don't get it. Timmay is allowed back on the dot net again. Myself a true blue Jayhawk fan is banned until 2029. No crap my message says banned until Apr 2 ,2029. Nbd..read the board for the first time in over a month and yeah that place still sucks big-time. Sucks more when Timmay is there. But that forum deserves his weak asss trolling.